In my Principles of
Distance Education course we have the opportunity to blog and reflect on our
experiences within the class and the topic of the current module every two
weeks. This week’s topic is the Next
Generation of Distance Learning. My
objective for this week is to compare and contrast the reasons the authors
believe there is a need to evolve distance education to the next generation.
I read a three-part article by Coleman, Foshay, Huett, and Moller
entitled "The Evolution of Distance Education: Implications for
Instructional Design on the Potential of the Web". I found these articles
particularly interesting because I am an Instructional Designer and am always
attempting to acquire as much knowledge as possible.
In part one of the article, the primary focus is Training and
Development. The authors put a lot of emphasis on the importance of having a
highly skilled instructional designer to design quality education in the
e-learning environment. The authors state that “the challenge for ID
professionals is not only to evolve the field, but also to assure that the
products of sound professional design practice lead the e-learning
enterprise". (Moller et al., 2008).
In part two of the article, higher education is the focal point.
The authors discuss how education has evolved and the overall need for distance
education has become greater by the year. The authors state "Distance
learning is rapidly becoming a popular choice for continuing professional
education, mid-career degree programs, and lifelong learning of all kinds".
(Moller et al., 2008). This article further showcases the importance of the
instructional designer but also discusses how often ID's tend to violate the
basics principles that we have been taught.
Part three of the article focuses on the k-12 environment within
distance education. The instructional designer’s role is highly discussed in
this capacity as well.
As an instructional designer, I can relate to all of the
statements within the article. I have been given the opportunity to design
effective instruction in the past and have seen process first hand. It’s
unfortunate to see a botched up level of design with poor quality. In the end
the learner suffers because of it. There is a high need to evolve
distance education for the next generation and based on the authors review, the
highly skilled instructional designer is the perfect person to do the job. I
guess the question remains though....Will more qualified and educated designers
continue to enter the field to meet the ever-growing demand ?
Resources:
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., &
Coleman, C. (2008). The Evolution of Distance Education: Implications for
Instructional Design on the Potential of the Web. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 52(5), 63-67.
doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0199-9
Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J.
(2008). The Evolution of Distance Education: Implications for Instructional
Design on the Potential of the Web. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 52(4), 66-70.
doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0179-0
Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008). The Evolution of Distance Education: Implications for Instructional Design on the Potential of the Web. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 52(3), 70-75. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0158-5
Cottrell,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post. It is so important that any educational lesson, whether it is on-line or face to face be well designed. I have sat in my fair share of poorly designed lessons and training. I strive to make my lesson enjoyable and informational for my students to keep them involved. That does make the hour go smoother and the kids do learn so much more.